0100481869

open access

Version of Record

Laboratory Flushing Tests of Dissolved Contaminants in Heterogeneous Porous Media with Low-Conductivity Zones

English (英語)

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

234(4)

240

Springer Nature

2023-04

2023-04-24

The retention of contaminants within low-conductivity regions such as clay lenses and aquitards can greatly affect groundwater remediation processes. The aim of this study was to experimentally investigate the effects of the geometry of low-conductivity zones, conductivity contrast, and flow regime on solute flushing. We conducted a series of flushing tests in cylindrical models containing a cylindrical low-conductivity zone (i.e., low-K zone) embedded in a highly conductive medium (i.e., high-K zone). Seven models comprising four high-conductivity-contrast (SL, SS, LL, and LS), one medium-contrast (LLM), one low-contrast (LLL), and one homogeneous (H) models were considered. Experiments were conducted at two flow rates (Q = 0.6 and 26 cm³/min) for each heterogeneous model (SL, SS, LL, LS, LLM, and LLL) to compare the flushing processes in different flow regimes. First, we verified the validity of our experiments by comparing the results of the H model from an analytical solution with our experiment. The results of the high-contrast models showed that for a diffusion-dominated regime (Q = 0.6 cm³/min), the pore volume injected (PVI) required to flush out solute mass was much smaller than that in an advection-dominated regime (Q = 26 cm³/min). To evaluate the pore volumes required to flush out solutes for the four high-contrast models, we introduced a parameter P₀.₀₁, which is defined as the PVI needed for the relative concentration to become 0.01 at the middle of the low-K zone. P₀.₀₁ decreases with increasing the specific surface area of the low-K zone for diffusion-dominated regimes, while it increases with increasing the length of the low-K zone for advection-dominated regimes. We also determined the importance of the effect of K contrast on solute retention by comparing the results of three different models of K contrast (LL, LLM, and LLL).

Advection

学術雑誌論文

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.