神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
登録はこちら
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14094/0100482110
このアイテムのアクセス数:
141
件
(
2026-01-11
04:42 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
0100482110 (fulltext)
pdf
197 KB
116
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
0100482110
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Accepted Manuscript
タイトル
Scalarity of the Japanese initial mora-based minimizer: a compositional (lexically unspecified) minimizer and a non-compositional (lexically specified) minimizer
著者
著者ID
A2609
研究者ID
1000040598083
KUID
https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/search/detail?systemId=89cc91d26bcad9c7520e17560c007669
著者名
Sawada, Osamu
澤田, 治
サワダ, オサム
所属機関名
人文学研究科
言語
English (英語)
収録物名
Natural Language Semantics
巻(号)
31(2)
ページ
71-120
出版者
Springer Nature
刊行日
2023-09
公開日
2024-06-05
注記
Published online: 05 June 2023
抄録
This study investigates interpretations of the Japanese initial mora-based minimizer “X.Y...”-no “X”-no ji-mo ‘lit. even the letter “X” of “X.Y...”.’ Although initial mora-based minimizers have a literal interpretation of ji ‘letter’, they have a non-literal interpretation as well. The non-literal interpretation has several distinctive features that are not present in ordinary minimizers. First, it is highly productive in that various expressions can appear in the form “X.Y...”-no “X”-no ji. Second, non-literal minimizers typically co-occur with predicates that relate to knowledge, information, concepts, thought, and habituality, as seen in the corpus data (Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese [BCCWJ]). I argue that in the non-literal use, X refers to the minimum on the scale of the main predicate concerning “X.Y...”. I suggest that the non-literal use was developed as a result of the conventionalization of the pragmatic inference derived from the literal reading, and that the co-occurrence with predicates related to knowledge, information, knowledge, concepts, thought, or habituality is due to the interpretation of “X.Y...”, which were originally interpreted as letters as an abstract concept. The theoretical implication of this study is that, in addition to a non-compositional (lexically specified) minimizer whose scale is lexically fixed (e.g., give a damn, lift a finger), there also exists a compositional (lexically unspecified) minimizer in natural language, whose scale is specified via the predicate with which the minimizer co-occurs. The last section of this paper briefly discusses similar/related phenomena in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian, Korean, and English from a cross-linguistic perspective.
キーワード
Initial mora-based minimizer
Non-literal reading
Scalarity
Lexical stipulation
Alternatives
Compositional vs. non-compositional minimizers
Cross-linguistic variation
カテゴリ
人文学研究科
学術雑誌論文
権利
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature's AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-023-09203-2
関連情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-023-09203-2
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
journal article
ISSN
0925-854X
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
eISSN
1572-865X
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
ホームへ戻る