81003435

open access

Version of Record

オカモト タロウ ニ ヨル ジョルジュ バタイユ ノ シソウ ノ ケイショウ ト ケツベツ

Continuity and Discontinuity between Taro Okamoto and Georges Bataille

Japanese (日本語)

神戸大学大学院人間発達環境学研究科研究紀要

5(1)

19-29

神戸大学大学院人間発達環境学研究科

2011-09

2011-11-01

This paper attempts to point out what is the divergence in the thought of Taro Okamoto and Georges Bataille. In this paper, I mainly referred to the records of Bataille’s activities in the 1930s, and analyzed the ideas of negativity and subjectivity. Okamoto and Bataille have the idea of negativity in common. They accepted it from the lecture on Phänomenologie des Geistes, which was given by Alexandre Kojève. This lecture has had a great effect on the acceptance of Hegel's philosophy in France. In the 1930s, Bataille expanded his idea of the unproductive expenditure in the three activities: Contre-attaque, Collège de sociologie sacré and Acéphale. Okamoto devoted himself to these activities. Bataille’s concept of negativity finally arrived at de-subjectivity. Okamoto broke with Bataille and declared his original idea, Antipodalism, in postwar Japan. Though the idea of negativity was continuity between Okamoto and Bataille at first, it also attained discontinuity in the end. In point of including the criticism of the rational subject, Okamoto's thought is de-subjectivity, too. Okamoto’s de-subjectivity is, however, a different style from Bataille's de-subjectivity.

紀要論文