神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81010610
このアイテムのアクセス数:
123
件
(
2025-05-01
12:18 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81010610 (fulltext)
pdf
1.32 MB
134
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81010610
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
ボリス・グロイスにおけるアートと政治の交差について
その他のタイトル
Art and Politics in the Art Theory of Boris Groys
著者
著者ID
A1133
研究者ID
1000040529947
KUID
https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/search/detail?systemId=9dc5b3cc4031e88e520e17560c007669
著者名
石田, 圭子
Ishida, Keiko
イシダ, ケイコ
所属機関名
国際文化学研究科
言語
Japanese (日本語)
収録物名
国際文化学研究 : 神戸大学大学院国際文化学研究科紀要
巻(号)
51
ページ
83*-104*
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際文化学研究科
刊行日
2018-12
公開日
2019-01-10
抄録
Boris Groys (1947—) is one of the most influential art critics today. He is concerned with the relationship between art and politics, which can be seen in his books Art Power (2008) and The Total Art of Stalinism (1992) and so on. The reasons for this concern may be rooted in his experiences while participating in the “unofficial” cultural scenes in the Soviet Union. In this paper, I consider this theme—art and politics—by focusing on Groys’s reflections on “the new” and “archive.” By attempting to distinguish his new from the new in both modernity and postmodernity, he expresses this “newness” as “a difference beyond difference.” He finds the model of this newness in Marcel Duchamp’s artwork. In my opinion, this reinterpretation of the new by Groys is motivated by searching for some clues about how to overcome contradictions in our political reality as well as considering the present condition of art. Groys gives much importance to archival spaces, such as museums, because he believes they are an indispensable condition when producing the new. While modernists and postmodernists generally think that existing cultural systems could damage the freedom of art, Groys still believes in the potential of the contemporary art system, and relies on it for its political possibilities. Groys thinks that the museum is an archive, where every image has an equal right to struggle for recognition. Therefore, we can consider it as a substitution for a political arena, that is, a space for appearance in Hanna Arendt’s definition. In addition, archives can redraw the boundaries of our political notions and categories; they deprive stable contexts in reality, giving multiple contexts and places. Groys does not find the potential of art in its direct statement on politics, but in its possibilities to produce the new.
カテゴリ
国際文化学研究科
国際文化学研究 : 神戸大学大学院国際文化学研究科紀要
>
51号(2018-12)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
ISSN
1340-5217
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
ホームへ戻る