神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81011855
このアイテムのアクセス数:
73
件
(
2024-10-12
20:14 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81011855 (fulltext)
pdf
1.52 MB
27
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81011855
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
権威主義福祉レジームにおける国家と非国家アクター : エジプトを事例として
ケンイ シュギ フクシ レジーム ニオケル コッカ ト ヒコッカ アクター : エジプト オ ジレイ トシテ
その他のタイトル
State and Non-State Actors in the Authoritarian Welfare Regime : The Case of Egypt
著者
著者ID
A2407
研究者ID
1000000784125
KUID
https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/search/detail?systemId=23dabf4bc4db5c83520e17560c007669
著者名
河村, 有介
Kawamura, Yusuke
カワムラ, ユウスケ
所属機関名
国際協力研究科
言語
Japanese (日本語)
収録物名
国際協力論集
巻(号)
27(1)
ページ
47-72
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際協力研究科
刊行日
2019-07-31
公開日
2019-08-09
抄録
This study examines (1) roles of non-state actors in welfare provision and (2) the relationship between state and non-state actors in the authoritarian welfare regime. To achieve these aims, the research focuses on welfare provision in modern Egypt. The Egyptian case study reveals the following two facts about the relationship between state and non-state actors in the authoritarian welfare regime. First, roles of non-state actors in welfare provision depend on authoritarian leaders’ survival strategies. The relationship was categorised as ‘state domination’ during the Nasser (1952–1970) and Sisi eras (2013–present). Governments considered non-state actors as powerful challengers and strongly controlled their every activity. Consequently, non-state actors had no room to provide their social welfare services to the populace. In contrast, the Sadat government (1970–1981) implemented partial political liberalisation and built a ‘coproduction’ relationship with non-state actors in welfare provision. Additionally, the Mubarak government (1981–2011) adopted a similar strategy. Consequently, social welfare services by non-state actors played an important role in poverty alleviation. Second, the Egyptian case demonstrates that political leaders have had dilemmas in relationships with non-state actors. Under the ‘coproduction’ relationship, political leaders can reduce social security expenditure by outsourcing welfare provision to non-state actors. However, this strategy enables non-state actors to gain support from the populace through their social welfare services. In contrast, under the ‘state domination’ relationship, authoritarian leaders can control non-state actors and monopolise channels of welfare provision. However, this strategy often causes citizen dissatisfaction with the authoritarian government. Additionally, authoritarian leaders are often criticised by international donors, such as the U.S. government, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, thus likely damaging the authoritarian rule’s legitimacy.
カテゴリ
国際協力研究科
国際協力論集
>
27巻
>
27巻1号(2019-07-31)
紀要論文
関連情報
URI
http://www.research.kobe-u.ac.jp/gsics-publication/jics/
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
ISSN
0919-8636
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AN10418744
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
ホームへ戻る