神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14094/90008671
このアイテムのアクセス数:
64
件
(
2025-08-02
22:59 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
90008671 (fulltext)
pdf
1.03 MB
44
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
90008671
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
Impact of alternative regional trade arrangements on the Ethiopian economy
著者
著者名
Habtamu Shiferaw, Amogne
著者ID
A1147
研究者ID
1000040172837
KUID
https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/search/detail?systemId=27bddb5a738fb80c520e17560c007669
著者名
Hagiwara, Taiji
萩原, 泰治
ハギワラ, タイジ
所属機関名
経済学研究科
言語
English (英語)
収録物名
Journal of Economic Structures
巻(号)
10
ページ
2
出版者
Springer
刊行日
2021-01-16
公開日
2021-10-14
抄録
The Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) is a Free Trade Area (FTA) regional trade agreement in Africa. Currently, Ethiopia is negotiating to join COMESA FTA. This study assesses the impact of three regional trade arrangements, COMESA FTA, customs unions, and the European Partnership Agreement (EPA) on the economy of Ethiopia. The analysis is based on a static Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model, version 9 database. Unlike previous studies, the customs union scenarios are designed at the detailed Harmonized System (HS) level. COMESA FTA (scenario 1) with standard GTAP model results in a welfare loss for Ethiopia due to negative terms of trade and investment-saving effect, but with unemployment closure (scenario 2); Ethiopia enjoys a welfare gain mainly due to endowment effect. In scenario 3 (COMESA customs union) and scenario 4 (European Partnership Agreement), Ethiopia loses due to negative terms of trade and investment-saving effect. There is a large increase in demand for unskilled labor force in Ethiopia by around US$23 million, US$112 million, and US$43 million for scenario 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Moreover, there is a positive output effect for oilseeds, leather, and basic metals across all scenarios. The world, as a whole, enjoys welfare gains with COMESA FTA (scenario 1 and 2). However, with scenario 3 and 4, there is an overall welfare loss. There is no strong reason for Ethiopia to move to the customs union, and the EPA in the short run. Therefore, a transition period is necessary, but it is recommended for Ethiopia to join COMESA FTA.
キーワード
Free trade area
Customs union
EPA
COMESA
Ethiopia
GTAP
カテゴリ
経済学研究科
学術雑誌論文
権利
© The Author(s) 2021.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
関連情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-020-00232-2
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
journal article
eISSN
2193-2409
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
ホームへ戻る