神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/E0041025
このアイテムのアクセス数:
217
件
(
2025-08-02
23:15 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
E0041025 (fulltext)
pdf
3.38 MB
207
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
E0041025
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
EU国民投票の分析 : 政党内・政党間政治とイギリス社会の分断
その他のタイトル
Analysis of EU Referendum : Intra- and Inter-Party Politics and Division in British Society
著者
著者ID
A0296
研究者ID
1000010162299
KUID
https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/search/detail?systemId=d809403741389134520e17560c007669
著者名
阪野, 智一
Sakano, Tomokazu
サカノ, トモカズ
所属機関名
国際文化学研究科
言語
Japanese (日本語)
収録物名
国際文化学研究 : 神戸大学大学院国際文化学研究科紀要
巻(号)
47
ページ
31-79
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際文化学研究科
刊行日
2016-12-25
公開日
2017-02-28
抄録
On 23 June 2016, the referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU was held. 51.9 per cent of the electorate had voted to leave the EU and 48.1 percent had opted to remain. While the electorate expressed significant support for EEC with 67.2 per cent at the first referendum in 1975, the UK has continued taking a cold attitude to deepening European integration since then. Whenever the UK judges that it will become disadvantage for its own national interest, the UK has almost always gained the opt-out from the EU as the nonparticipation in the euro and the treaty of Schengen shows typically. There are, therefore, good reasons for that the UK is made fun of as “awkward partner.” Why did the Cameron government dare to carry out the in/out referendum? Why could the Leave vote win? Main purposes of this article to analyze the political process of EU referendum as the product of intra-party as well as inter-party politics. By using the micro approach to party organization, I want to demonstrate that Cameron adopted the referendum in order to manage intra-party dissent on European integration within the conservative party. At the same time, by applying theories of mainstream versus niche party competition to the interaction between the Conservative party and the UKIP, I want to show that the EU referendum pledges adopted by Conservatives are electoral responses to the rising UKIP. Furthermore, it is revealed how the 2016 referendum gave full expression to much deeper divides in the British society. We find that the public vote for Brexit was delivered by the ‘left behind’ voters with older, low-skilled and less well-educated blue-collar workers who have been pushed to the margins not only by the economic transformation of the country, but also by political changes over recent decades.
カテゴリ
国際文化学研究科
国際文化学研究 : 神戸大学大学院国際文化学研究科紀要
>
47号(2016-12-25)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
ISSN
1340-5217
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
ホームへ戻る